![]()
Academic Journals and Professional
Conferences
Q.
How do I submit research to an academic journal or a professional
conference?
Q.
What conference sessions/events offer the best opportunities for
networking?
Q.
Where can I find information about upcoming conferences in my field?
Q.
How can I obtain financial assistance for professional conferences?
Q.
How do I select a dissertation committee?
Q.
How do I decide on a dissertation topic?
Q.
At what point in my doctoral program should I enter the job market?
Q.
When I do go on the job market, what kind of materials should I send to
the hiring institution?
Q.
When I finally get a job offer, what elements of that offer are
negotiable?
![]()
A. Submission processes vary from journal to journal and from conference to conference. Therefore, once you have decided upon the appropriate outlet for your paper, visit the journal’s/conference’s website and search for submission guidelines. In addition, most journals publish their submission requirements once or twice a year. Similarly, if you are a member of the association sponsoring the conference, you will generally get information in the mail about this. Be sure to follow these guidelines precisely, since most journals and conferences will not accept any papers that do not follow their idiosyncratic format.
A.
Acceptance rates for journals vary and are a function of the journal’s
prestige, the quality/rigor of the content, etc. That being the case, most acceptance rates for top tier journals
are less than 10%. And, that is only
for the first submission. In fact,
reviewers almost always require at least one revision. Furthermore, the acceptance rate for
revisions is generally around 50%, resulting in an aggregate acceptance rate of
less than 5%. However, since most
peer-reviewed journals are reviewed “blind,” all that matters is the quality of
your work and the degree to which it matches the format of the journal, and not
who you are.
Although acceptance rates for conferences also vary, they tend to be
much higher than for journals, some as high as 30%. Furthermore, most prominent conferences use blind, peer-reviews
so that you will receive the same high quality feedback you would from a
journal submission. Bottom line, the
success of any paper is a function of its quality and its match with the
session theme.
A. While the standard paper presentation
conference sessions may be quite informative regarding the newest topics of
interest in the field, they are generally very passive. For a more interactive experience, consider
attending any professional development workshops or socials hosted by those
divisions in which you are interested.
These events often provide the opportunity to meet other doctoral
students as well as high profile faculty members. Such connections may not only yield greater insight into the
field, but also provide you with collaborators for co-authorship and/or
critical reviewing of your research.
A.
Ask the faculty members at your university that do research in your
field and/or go to the websites of the conferences in which you are
interested. Also, associations that
sponsor conferences generally send information in the mail to their members, so
consider becoming a member of any associations that interest you if you have
not already done so.
A. Most conferences offer at the very least
discounted rates for students and some offer full reimbursement of registration
fees and lodging in exchange for some level of service at the meeting. So, check with the association sponsoring
the conference – visit the conference website and/or scour any materials sent
in the mail to see what types of funding are available. In addition, check with the faculty and
support staff at your university. Some
departments offer financial assistance for students attending professional
conferences, especially those presenting papers. Lastly, check with those associations (if applicable) from whom
you are receiving financial aid for your schooling. Oftentimes, these agencies also provide money to attend
professional meetings.
![]()
A.
There are three critical elements to consider when selecting members of
your dissertation committee. First, try
to select members that have some expertise and interest in your topic
area. The guidance that experts in the
field can offer you will be invaluable as you inevitably struggle through the
literature and search for appropriate methodological tools. Also, a keen interest on their part will
ensure that you will receive such feedback in a timely fashion. Second, try to select members that have
contacts at the types of organizations (academic or industry) you hope to work
for when you complete your studies. A
good recommendation will go a long way toward getting you in the door when you
go on the job market. Third, try to
select members that get along with each other and with whom you have worked
well in the past. All of you will be
working very closely with one another for the next few years and it can be
extremely unpleasant if you don’t all get along or if they have serious
reservations about your work for any reason.
Start by selecting your chair first, as this will be the person with
whom you spend the most time and will provide you with the most feedback. In the event that this person does not
possess all of the above attributes, try to then select committee members with
characteristics that complement those of your chair. However, be sure to include your chair in the decision process,
as his/her insights regarding the other potential committee members will be
invaluable.
A. Try to select a topic that you’re truly
interested in researching for the next few years, especially if you plan on
getting a job in academia. Most new
professors continue the stream of research they began in their dissertation, in
fact, you will generally be hired under the assumption that you will publish in
the same area as your dissertation topic.
However, even if you do not plan on working in academia after completing
your degree, selecting a topic that interests you will tend to keep you more
motivated over the long haul than a topic that is dictated by your chair or one
that is en vogue at the moment
.
A. Like several of the other
questions about landing a job, this one depends on the kind of job you're
seeking. If you want to work in business, consider applying early in your
doctoral program. Some industrial employers and consulting firms hire
provisionally. Such employers provide part-time on-site employment, say, during
summers. They may also provide part-time work during the academic year that you
can do at your computer without moving to their city or even spending much or
any time in their local office. These jobs are often offered with the provision
that after you complete your doctorate you will be offered a full-time
professional position.
On the other
hand, if academia is your target, consider the part-time teaching that you do
during your doctoral program as a step into the job search and job market. Try
to get part-time teaching not only at the school where you're earning your
doctorate, but also at other schools. Breadth in your early part-time teaching
jobs prior to earning your degree will broaden the range of likely prospects
for your full-time, post-degree academic job.
However, if you choose to engage in part-time teaching at other
universities, be sure that it does not consume your study time and impede your
ability to complete your degree in a timely fashion.
A. The answer depends on the
kind of job and organization to which you're applying. For instance, academic
employers, especially the more traditional ones, are likely to want to see
copies of articles and books you've published and your dissertation abstract (possibly
the complete dissertation if you've completed it). Among those academic
employers who are seriously considering you, you can count on one or two people
reading at least one or two of the things you send and asking you about them
somewhere in the recruiting process. If
you're applying to non-traditional universities and/or businesses, include
copies of any professional videos you've made or training programs you've
created that show off your unique capabilities and viewpoints. Also, if you're
applying for a position in business that requires a great deal of writing,
include a copy of your best-written paper even if it has not been published.
Bottom line, be sure to customize the materials you send out to each potential
employer and when in doubt, ask prospective employers what things they'd
like to see and then be sure to provide them.
A. The answer to this question
also varies greatly depending on the job market in which you place
yourself. If you hope to land an academic job in a traditional
university, the list of scholarly achievements you'll want to share should
include (roughly in order of importance):
- your publications in research journals,
- books you've written (including your dissertation, if
completed),
- academic conference presentations,
- publications in practitioner journals,
- practitioner conference presentations,
- research/writing underway (including dissertation, if not yet
complete)
- honors you've won for your research or articles,
- university courses you've designed and taught, and
- university courses you've taught that were designed by others.
However, if
you hope to get an appointment at a non-traditional school, your research and
publications might be valued less than your presentations to practitioner
groups.
Employers
outside academia might have altogether different interests and different
definitions of scholarly achievement. It is critical that you be careful about
assumptions you make about what employers want and that you do your best to
honor their assumptions. So be sure to ask prospective employers what they'd
like to see and then be sure to provide them.
A. Technically speaking,
everything is always negotiable. Obviously, asking for something that's
outrageous in the eyes of the offering institution may take you out of the
race. However, not asking will certainly result in your not getting what you
want if it's the least bit outside the norm. It's important to keep in mind
that when an employer makes you an offer, you may have more control or
influence than you think. First of all, the offering institution wants you.
Second, since you're new to the game, an offering institution might be more
understanding and acceptant of a specific request from you than would be the
case had the request been made by someone who is more familiar with the culture
(and therefore the limits) of the organization. Another consideration is that doctoral students in many
universities come to feel like second-class citizens when in their student
role. This orientation can be just as destructive for you in the job market as
it is in your doctoral program. We urge you to be assertive and ask for what
you need and want, especially if you know that what you're asking for is within
the range, or not too far outside the range, of what other employers offer to
others. When in doubt, speak to your advisor, chair, or other faculty member
about your negotiation strategy, as he/she will have had some experience in
this area.
Please note that the
information contained in this FAQ is a collection of opinions gathered by a
variety of Doctoral students and does not represent an official statement of
either the Academy of Management or the Doctoral Student Liaison
Committee. Hopefully your will find the
information provides some interesting perspectives.
If you would like to respond to this document with suggestions, ideas,
criticism, or additional questions, please e-mail them to Scott Newbert